mrantichrist Posted June 1, 2004 Posted June 1, 2004 maybe im alone on this but i think that cars should do more damage when u hit a person who is walking, would it be possible to change this? at 70 miles and hour hitting someone should really be a one hit kill.
orappa Posted June 1, 2004 Posted June 1, 2004 I remember on one of the dev movies they showed one-hit kills with cars, but there was some debate as to whether it would make it to the final release or not.
MAD_BOY Posted June 1, 2004 Posted June 1, 2004 nope, don't increase it, else it's too dangerous to walk over street
vass69 Posted June 1, 2004 Posted June 1, 2004 thats not a good idea, think there is a robber war and there are like 10 robbers shooting each other, then 1 guy comes and kills at least the half of them with a car.
+FKU+VVolven Posted June 1, 2004 Posted June 1, 2004 (edited) I'd say yeah, as a admin/server config option later on, but right now, it's just aggravating when you're having a shootout with someone and someone else decides that making you a hood ornament's a good idea. Edited June 2, 2004 by Guest
vass69 Posted June 1, 2004 Posted June 1, 2004 only 1 vote for yes, i guess its the poster who voted it no1 likes it
Slothman Posted June 1, 2004 Posted June 1, 2004 im split on this issue, cause i could see how increasing the damage could kill gameplay and make it nothing but a destruction derby. on the other hand, it's not terribly hard to avoid getting hit by a car by simply jumping over the car, or to the side. lag usually takes care of the rest
Gamefreek Posted June 1, 2004 Posted June 1, 2004 I remember on one of the dev movies they showed one-hit kills with cars, but there was some debate as to whether it would make it to the final release or not. That was in a MTA:GTA3 video, they havent messed with any of the data in VC to do that. Cars in GTA3 are 1-hit kills anyway.
orappa Posted June 1, 2004 Posted June 1, 2004 I remember on one of the dev movies they showed one-hit kills with cars, but there was some debate as to whether it would make it to the final release or not. That was in a MTA:GTA3 video, they havent messed with any of the data in VC to do that. Cars in GTA3 are 1-hit kills anyway. Are they? I didn't know that.
vass69 Posted June 1, 2004 Posted June 1, 2004 if it would be endabled then it would be the noob weapon nr1 to kill ppl the weapons would be on 2nd place
orappa Posted June 1, 2004 Posted June 1, 2004 if it would be endabled then it would be the noob weapon nr1 to kill ppl Yeah, it'd become more popular than heli-killing because heli-killing has an element of skill in that it's difficult to fly the damn thing.
orappa Posted June 1, 2004 Posted June 1, 2004 i killed this one dude in two hits, definatly not It's not difficult once you get used to it, but it's still not as straightforward (nor as n00b friendly) as a car.
Guardians Proper Posted June 1, 2004 Posted June 1, 2004 As with every other damage in MTA: It's fine as it is.
orappa Posted June 1, 2004 Posted June 1, 2004 As with every other damage in MTA: It's fine as it is. Yep, I like the way that the team respect and don't like to tinker with the core GTA gameplay (probably one of the main reasons for MTA's success).
Guardians Proper Posted June 1, 2004 Posted June 1, 2004 As with every other damage in MTA: It's fine as it is. Yep, I like the way that the team respect and don't like to tinker with the core GTA gameplay (probably one of the main reasons for MTA's success). It's best just left alone.
Kent747 Posted June 1, 2004 Posted June 1, 2004 we don't do any damage modifiers w/ any weapons or vehicles, (this is important to us)... as such the easy peasy vehicle kills in GTA3 compared to VC, is just something that will make each its own special type of gameplay.. .I can say this, GTA3 multiplayer is much more intense. VC is nice if you like room... Kent
Guardians Proper Posted June 1, 2004 Posted June 1, 2004 It's good to have two games at two different poles... That way, everyone is happy.
orappa Posted June 1, 2004 Posted June 1, 2004 It's good to have two games at two different poles...That way, everyone is happy. Yep, it's a great idea. It ensures an even spread of each game (otherwise I'd probably just play GTA3 which I prefer). But I can guarantee that n00bs still won't be happy...
mrantichrist Posted June 2, 2004 Author Posted June 2, 2004 well, if I am alone on this fine, its a democracy and i can deal with that but i don’t see y throwing a pinch of realism into the mix would hurt, and for all the shit heads that say 1 hit vehicles kills ruin fighting on foot I would like to recommend that they try playing halo or ut2004, vehicles being a threat hardly ruin foot combat, they add a new level to it. For me, this would make the game better, and while I don’t ask you agree with me. I do think its ridiculous to call me a "poser" simply because I don’t think its right for someone to come away all but unscathed after being hit by a bus going 70.
+FKU+VVolven Posted June 2, 2004 Posted June 2, 2004 (edited) ...and for all the shit heads that say 1 hit vehicles kills ruin fighting on foot I would like to recommend that they try playing halo or ut2004, vehicles being a threat hardly ruin foot combat, they add a new level to it. S'true, a driver's as vunerable behind the wheel as they are behind the barrel... but unlike Halo, the vehicles absorb all the damage done to you in Vice City until they explode, we still don't have weapons in it that're vehicle destroyers like a RPG or sniper rifles to pick off the driver through the glass, and in Halo you can move while using said weapons. Edited June 2, 2004 by Guest
Guardians Proper Posted June 2, 2004 Posted June 2, 2004 And then you have people using mods to make their cars invincible...
Slothman Posted June 2, 2004 Posted June 2, 2004 at least blasting people off bikes is possible, and very very very extremely satisfying
Recommended Posts