xerox

its either A. modifications to the vc handling config or B. a ramp-mod or something both are bad mmmkay?

i dont really like the idea of a program logging my keystrokes - and that is too easily fooled, just make a proggy that presses a letter into a notepad thing 1million times hell, just go to some multinational corp office and install it on all of those (they win =)

unfortunantly i dont think a lot of those stunts were landed and controlled (then again im a picky basted =P) some good original stunts (all im judging on)

carsor possibly though i do like vegas/japan (mmm... schoolgi *ahem* anyways... ) i guess that means that vice was gta4 (didnt we all get suckered into thinking it was more of an expansion? =P ) anyway - all r* have to do is evolve the current format, give us a better stunt interpretations to include grinds, walltaps, wallrides, combos etc (vice city's pro stunter anyone?) i dunno - a new class of vehicles perhaps - maybe remake the gta2 world in 3d mmmmm

will probably make some people better =P btw - landing stunts while drunk does not increase their quality/steez etc =P - just means your a fluke artist ;-P

o...k?????? - thread closed i uh.. think

what about shoing the current highest spin/stoppie/ length stats like in gtat - but only when the current record is broken (and landed/controlled)

the ending to your vid is the best ever - gta3 Low riider *xerox hums the rest*

hmm - please dont create a topic to this effect - thanks =)

hmm - i could probably break all of them - but im too lazy to run fraps =P especially with having to take the screen and all you added longest stoppie/wheelie in there?

these things can only be proven on video - nuff said

ok - it seems im damned if i do, damned if i dont here my 2 cents, feel free to add constructive critisism, quote me on other forums etc. first of all, gtaT is competition, always has been, always will be. the MTA crew have respected GtaT since day 1, and have given them a lot of support (and tolerance at times) But it seems that everything is strike and counter-strike (let me explain myself posty). We release something, and then a little later, gtaT does the same. This is either schrewd(sp?) bussiness skill, or the oppurtunity to improve your mod by 'liberating' the ideas of another. Ideas are free, but its annoying when we put in lots of effort to release something, only to see it being used elsewhere in another fashion. Posty, you are probably right in saying that you have had a lot of things that are in development since gtat 0.3, but in saying that, these forums have stated ideas for many game-modes, addtions, modifictations etc since about gta3:mta 0.2 which i have seen used on gtaT (which is fine) but the fact that you seem to wait until after we have made a press release, gives the impression (not that impression was the word i was looking for) that you are copying us. Yes in saying that, if you release something first the mta team may 'possibly' do the same (and copy, 'possibly'), but that may be a risk you will have to take to stop some of the accusations. secondly, GTAt is known for making some 'fisherman's tales' claims (our netcode was this =|------------------------------|= compressed <-- yes they are meant to be arms ;-P ) GTAt have stated things on forums etc which seem impossible, or have not been backed up with code, (not that we can prove that) or more importantly, a public release to prove these claims. I think its a case of theoretical capabilities and actual work, im sure you are able to code this, but sometimes it is better to keep the fact that you are able to put X cars in the game a secret (if you think its a bit outlandish) until you can at least give some proof of it. Draco, this may seem pointless, as im sure you are doing this already, but dont feel pressured by MTA, there is an ability for us to co-exist in some respect. Keep on going and dont be put off by any of the mta vs gtat bullshit; just code it =) Just like with the 'tintin' debacle before gtat 0.1 the proof is in the code, so good luck to yourself, hackerkid, trunkstom and the gtaT forum crew.

both vids are very well done slick production, some nice stunts, and one original line i havent personally seen used before both vids were cool commercial cheesy trance thrown in for a difference, seriously, pick whatever music ya want

bah - thread closed

problem is, smaller gangs are getting shunned at times, gangs that are prevalent on the forums have to look beyond the forums for challengers etc. I just hope that the inter-challenging doesnt make us all weak =P

was terry pratchet approached?

drum and bass all the way =) some jazzy, soul, funk type stuff would be cool as well though judging the music is impossible to do as that comes down to taste. It shouldnt matter in the long run, as long as the stunts and editing are quality

*reads the above*... - nuff said I dont even need to be around to start flaming people, everyone does it for me =) damn - was this guy trolling for responses or what? Next time make a list of why i suck, constructive critisism is always welcome Bump - could you control your P.L.A.S.T.A members - they are getting rowdy =P oh well, thread reclosed

gtaT's stunt mod does have a cool little feature showing the stunts in the top left, i think thats great, even gives the $ amount.

asked to delete - but its easier to lock it - thread locked by request **************************************** Thread Closed

join the a training gang like the VCA (shameless self-promotion) - there people like titanium eyes and myself will teach you about stunting and other things

i was a suspect? - cool =) anyway - i dont know why - but im tempted to leave this thread open a little longer.

depends if bump wants pseudo-human cartoons in there or not

now i told you that you would be back here posting =) anyway - anyone found cheating in mta will be ass-raped to within an inch of their afterlife by certain individuals who shall not be named (the ones who mention goat-sex all the time ;-P )

bumpo marx also seems to have taken a similar policy =) What about monty python himself? - thought he may have been in there