JacoB

http://colocam.commpartners.us/ViewerFr ... Language=0 People are moving around inside. Try to get their attention

Hahaha.. you know, the beach ball already has a '3rd-party sync' in the current version. No reason why it wouldn't have one in blue.

Your not mistaking, by now its obviously not a secret. I'm just jacob at mtaforums. That has nothing to do with here, because if it did I would be banned by now. Wonder where you got your sig from Annnyway people, try out some of these webcams. I got someone to notice me once, by moving the camera everywhere they went. They just looked at the camera funny and left the room.. lol

Thats not what I'm asking. Read my question again

Using an interesting google search, you can gain access to literally thousands of misc webcams from all over the world. 99% of them are controllable, with little arrow keys you can click to move the cameras around. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&c2coff=1&q=inurl%3A%22MultiCameraFrame%3FMode%3D%22 Most on page 1 time out, but around 5+ you start getting the visuals. Thanks to GTAF for the link, and have fun spying.

...... jk with that pic. I was just wondering, will the ingame client be the only way of starting an MTA game, or will we still be able to use the old-fashioned client with ASE? And if so, I'd imagine it would look much different?

Ban their ISP, IP prefix, email address, username, video card ID, CD key, and MAC address. I've never heard anything more desperate. Before you dwell so deeply into some remarkable banning system that will make someone have to change their whole f*cking identiy to be able to come back, play the game and see just how many cheaters pop up. The amount of cheaters in Blue compared to today's will be cut in half. The overall amount of players will eventually be multiplied by atleast 5. From what I've heard, wich is just as much as most of you, these add-ons will give people enough fun as is. So yes, your making far too over-exagerated predictions.

I agree.. encrypted messages would most likely stop those god-awful bots, depending on how random/encypted the encryption actually is.

What a funny quote. MTA's current version is unstable even without modifications, for one. For two, it entirely depends on A) the mod itself, and B) if other people are using the same mod. Here, I'll go into a little bit more detail: You play the game with an unstable mod that other people arent using, severe chance of game crashes You play the game with an unstable mod that everyone else is using, frequent chance of sync'd game crashes You play the game with a stable mod that other people aren't using, frequent risk of game crashes, depending on if the mod effects the position of cars / players or simply changes things like appearence (models, textures, particles) You play the game with a stable mod that everyone else is using, low risk of game crash. And just to clarify myself, the "game crash" I'm talking about are the ones that supposedly come from mods, not the ones that randomly come from MTA.

There are two types of MTA modders. The type who purposely ruin gameplay and actually try to piss people off, and the type who try to make gameplay funner for themselves. I don't know if CZ3 uses his map mods in public servers, but I know that other people have, and CZ3 is to blame for it. His maps can be very very fun, with the insane ramps and stunts he adds to the map, but it all depends on how Blue will handle map mods. If it blocks them, chances are he will still continue to make them, and if it allowed them, chances are his maps would be more publicly / legally used. So basically, the answer to 'are you going to try to use different sets of rules in blue servers', lies in the MTA Team's hands. The real question is, are you going to allow map mods.

This isn't the "who made GTA:T" topic either, nub.

Welll there are physics that go beyond cheesy handling.cfg edits, but the dodo would be fun in Vice City.

Are you talking about banned from all MTA Servers, or just banned from one? To be banned from all would require a repetitive tendancy to break the rules, you would think. But yes, to change all that could be switching computers and ISP's. Wich I don't think any of us here are rich enough to do.

1) Refresh the page and read my previous post. 2) I could honestly care less what you think, your ignorance makes your importance just about as low as your maturity level. 3) Read my sig in reverse. 4.) Goodbye.

If I were denying that I wasn't him, I would technically be saying that I am him. And look a little further on that "anti mta" site, particularily the "Previous MTA modding" section, particularily the pinned topic in this section. Everybody here knows who I am, as long as I don't provide any links to any illegal content, there is no reason for my opinions not to be expressed on this fourm. I am just Jacob here, been there done that. And thanks for the un-wanted good luck charm, bots are f*cking gay.

1. You're making up random statistics. 2. If you find a good mod, tell people about it. It's only underrated if people keep it under their hats. 1. I'm giving the concept that I think there will be a LOT of mods. Call it what you want. 2. Will do.

What I do outside this forum has nothing to do with here. Of course I will defend MTA until a better mod gives me a reason not to. And I've never even heard of the Jacob you're talking about. I read you out of context and thought you were calling me a fool.

I think what he means is that, One person is the driver and the other person si the shooter (with First Person view) Hope that's available in Blue! .. here we go with the 'glue' conversation again

unworthy bump

lol i didnt even mention GTAT, but ok, if you want to play it that way. so what ? 0.5e crashes a lot? 0.3r2 crashed a lot too, but i enjoyed it for months, just like most ppl did(hmm i wonder why most of them dont play mta 0.4.1 ?) though 0.5F will be a lot better, but you wont believe that. oh about the site, it happens sometime, the mta forums/site have been down a few times as well. actually i dont even understand why you are talking about gtat itself, because the topic isn't about it, but about mta's current core, and the scm things mr respectless. has been said before, even by myself.................. PS: are you cBc JacoB? if you are, then you are a fool to defend mta, since you hack it. if not, then just ignore this. The topic of my latest post was about GTA:T because of this quote: The only think that can even compete with MTA would be GTA:T, and thats at a very very low basis. No one can say anything for GTA:C yet because they also have the potential to not make frequent updates. I don't know a "cBc JacoB". Perhaps you meant cMc; nevertheless, don't call me a fool. Perhaps you should also learn the proper definition of hack.

There is a great deal of "cheaters" that are just trying to make their game funner. Blue will allow these "cheaters" to do what they've always wanted without violating the EULA, thus giving them a more mature title. But the n00b cheaters will pile in and try their trainers with MTA, no doubt about it. Wich is why I agree with this idea. But one question: How will the client validate the user? Through the http://www.mtavc.com server? What if the server is down? That makes the whole game unplayable. No server has 100% uptime, its always a 99.9999. I suppose they could have the user database hosted on more than one server incase one fails.

What about the 1337 coders that will appear out of nowhere, months after Blue's release. They would most likely spend weeks on a mod, and it will never get popular. /me hopes mta team comes up with a good way of distributing blue addons why do you think that most ppl are so close minded? I predict a thousand mods up for download, and maybe a good 30 popular ones. A very good mod might just be "another mod", and easily underrated and overlooked.

What about the 1337 coders that will appear out of nowhere, months after Blue's release. They would most likely spend weeks on a mod, and it will never get popular. /me hopes mta team comes up with a good way of distributing blue addons

Yeah that wouldn't be hard to do, but most likely won't be a part of 0.4.5

x2