Callidus Posted October 8, 2005 Share Posted October 8, 2005 So, with the release of blue looking so ever sooner. Does blue have any anti-cheating implemented? Will we expect a large cheating community? Because of the fact it's only racing I can see a lot of people ready for using cheats. Also, just read your going to release the SDK. Will that have some problems that will come backstab you with cheating? Not a fan of the cheating community that has came with GTA online (MTA,VCMP) despise them all. So will we expect less cheating? Not an expert on programming what so ever, but is it not possible to have somebody on the team, search for cheats and change what is needed? then release small updates? I know that might sound crazy, but just something from the top of my head. P.S I obviously know cheating will always happen, just asking if there is any protection against it. Link to comment
njr1489 Posted October 8, 2005 Share Posted October 8, 2005 You can expect a lot of cheating if a lot of people know about that certain site. MTA can always be cracked, there is no such thing as an uncrackable software. It could take one man to do it all. Just hope that a lot of people don't know about cheating. Link to comment
Vicer/Spitfire Posted October 8, 2005 Share Posted October 8, 2005 MP5 why do you have a warning? Link to comment
Gareth Posted October 8, 2005 Share Posted October 8, 2005 they are making a competent anticheat system this time like making a hash for each use (code) so when they are banned their code is banned from that server so they cant bypass it Link to comment
orappa Posted October 9, 2005 Share Posted October 9, 2005 Because it is integrated into GTA, Blue has more advanced cheat detection abilities. Link to comment
xerox Posted October 9, 2005 Share Posted October 9, 2005 The team are actually putting work into that right now. Unfortunantly there will ALWAYS be a way to cheat, but the idea is to make it as hard as possible. Link to comment
Gareth Posted October 9, 2005 Share Posted October 9, 2005 nice that your making it harder for them and all Link to comment
ChrML Posted October 9, 2005 Share Posted October 9, 2005 Ofcourse we can't go into details at this part . Ie, it'll stay outside the blog. Link to comment
rockstarrem Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 Cheaters Fuck Horse's Link to comment
Harry Posted October 10, 2005 Share Posted October 10, 2005 usefull post... just like this one Cheater suck. end of conversation. They should all be killed or go back to their mother Link to comment
Guest Posted October 22, 2005 Share Posted October 22, 2005 but if they are cheating they cant be killed .. I think you must plant in a cheat detector for spead and health like that Link to comment
Slothman Posted October 22, 2005 Share Posted October 22, 2005 but if they are cheating they cant be killed .. I think you must plant in a cheat detector for spead and health like that most cheaters can indeed be killed, and it is soooo satisfying when you get em. Cheaters in general really really suck at playing and there are ways of taking em out of the game. Link to comment
erorr404 Posted October 22, 2005 Share Posted October 22, 2005 but if they are cheating they cant be killed .. I think you must plant in a cheat detector for spead and health like that most cheaters can indeed be killed, and it is soooo satisfying when you get em. Cheaters in general really really suck at playing and there are ways of taking em out of the game. I think Harry meant killing them IRL. Link to comment
MTA Team jhxp Posted October 22, 2005 MTA Team Share Posted October 22, 2005 but if they are cheating they cant be killed .. I think you must plant in a cheat detector for spead and health like that most cheaters can indeed be killed, and it is soooo satisfying when you get em. Cheaters in general really really suck at playing and there are ways of taking em out of the game. True I was able to pwn cheaters in ET (who had wallhax, aimbot and who knows what else ) many times, just because they've sucked at game Link to comment
Jayster Posted December 15, 2005 Share Posted December 15, 2005 You can expect a lot of cheating if a lot of people know about that certain site. MTA can always be cracked, there is no such thing as an uncrackable software. It could take one man to do it all. Just hope that a lot of people don't know about cheating. True. But could it be found that someone is cheating? Like put a really safe software into Blue. Just like the trainer. But even more professional - Can the Blue Platform SA builders do this somehow? Link to comment
xGj Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 You can expect a lot of cheating if a lot of people know about that certain site. MTA can always be cracked, there is no such thing as an uncrackable software. It could take one man to do it all. Just hope that a lot of people don't know about cheating. True. But could it be found that someone is cheating? Like put a really safe software into Blue. Just like the trainer. But even more professional - Can the Blue Platform SA builders do this somehow? Even if cheating detection doesnt work, it'll be always possible to ban. You cant crack bans as they arent on your own pc. Perhaps it's a good idea to implent a generally ban system who bans the person from all servers there are if cheating is detected by several clients of people who are in the servers ( don't know if that'd be possible ). Something like we have in GRS, which has a file that contains banned adresses of known cheaters. Link to comment
s0beit Posted December 17, 2005 Share Posted December 17, 2005 well with a SDK comes a whole new level of cheating that i think few are acually capable of. so dont expect any good cheats for MTA Blue as the few people that could possibly accomplish this have lost interest in the mod a while ago. Link to comment
By-Stander Posted December 17, 2005 Share Posted December 17, 2005 Thats great news. Long may they stay away. Link to comment
xGj Posted December 17, 2005 Share Posted December 17, 2005 well with a SDK comes a whole new level of cheating that i think few are acually capable of.so dont expect any good cheats for MTA Blue as the few people that could possibly accomplish this have lost interest in the mod a while ago. I think they have a solution on cheating detection of the SDK. However, they said they dont wanna limit anyone in doing what they like, so if anyone makes a server which is set-up for cheating, it is allowed. I only think they'll use the same cheat detection that they have now to prevent cheaters from coming into servers where it isn't allowed to cheat. Link to comment
s0beit Posted December 18, 2005 Share Posted December 18, 2005 well with a SDK comes a whole new level of cheating that i think few are acually capable of.so dont expect any good cheats for MTA Blue as the few people that could possibly accomplish this have lost interest in the mod a while ago. I think they have a solution on cheating detection of the SDK. However, they said they dont wanna limit anyone in doing what they like, so if anyone makes a server which is set-up for cheating, it is allowed. I only think they'll use the same cheat detection that they have now to prevent cheaters from coming into servers where it isn't allowed to cheat. its not the acual sdk full compiled libraries that are in jeopardy of being manipulated. its not like any kind of cheat that has been developed before, for MTA anyway. Link to comment
{Static} Posted December 18, 2005 Share Posted December 18, 2005 The SDK will allow modification of the game, of course that can be abused. Link to comment
darkdreamingdan Posted December 18, 2005 Share Posted December 18, 2005 You guys are misunderstanding the purpose and features of the SDK Link to comment
{Static} Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 I know what the SDK is for, but everything can be exploited to some degree, and this is no exception. Link to comment
orappa Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 I know what the SDK is for, but everything can be exploited to some degree, and this is no exception. So you're saying we shouldn't have an SDK because of the possibility to abuse it? Link to comment
{Static} Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 I didn't say that at all Link to comment
Recommended Posts