Si|ent

http://forum.mtavc.com/viewforum.php?f=47 Perhaps search or at least browse before asking next time?

The admin tool that comes with it should suffice for basic admin tasks. Or for more advanced options MTAMA: an administration script that runs within mIRC. The addons section of these forums has many more details on the latter, as well as add-on scripts for it.

Yes I read the whole post. You don't seem to grasp the concept of the Blue platform and its versatility. Perhaps it's best that you wait until the first MTA built upon it is released, and it becomes clearer to you.

Blue is a platform, not a game or version of MTA in itself, so the question is flawed. We have yet to finalise all game design plans that will form the gamemodes that ship with the first MTAs built upon Blue. Finishing off the platform itself, and adapting to San Andreas, take priority.

The mod creator isn't the person to judge wether the mod is 'OK', the MTA Team retains the right to prevent release of modifications, or approve of them. At no time has carte blanche been given in this regard.

Sounds like audio isues error404, try different drivers and settings, fences used to slow my gta3 to a crawl before I tweaked a little

On the contrary, customised HUDs will be possible relatively simply in future MTA's built upon the Blue core. The current core (0.5 and previous versions) of course should not be used alongside any other mods, as it clearly states in both the EULA and the manual.

Why not just keep your gang tag? It is your identity far more than it is a literal translation of the words that make it up. Plenty of gangs play in both vc and gta3 with VC in thier name, why would SA be different? If your really truly concerned about soem kind of logic or reason for an 'incorrect' name, tell yourself VCES are visiting San Andreas, or assisting the local emergency services in a time of emergency, or similar. Or just Twist the meaning of your current name. For example, VCA, Vice City Army, is VCA, Vested Columbian Assassins if asked in gta3mta.

http://forum.mtavc.com/viewtopic.php?t=10528

Seen the ACTUAL P.C. screenshots yet? Seen how fake this was?

I can't think of any time that it is 'imperitive' that you suicide. Unless that'ss your way of preventing somebody from killing you. It's really quite simple, if you wish to travel far afield you will be aware there are no vehicles there should you need one, and you will take that into account when deciding to travel or not.

And then proudly boasted that he was still klined, yet in channel. And yes, we know it was you now jani. Anyway, on topic: I don't see the aiming system being a particularly big issue nor problem.

That would be horrible, for all sorts of reasons. Cheat detection, running from combat, disrupting chases to name but a few.

Thats the risk you take, and the choice you make. It never stopped a dodo pilot from flying away from the 'active' island, or an mtavc0.1 player from travelling to the airport.

Why on earth are you posting this on our forum, in the help section of all places?

Wouldn't they just. I hear http://www.google.com is most excellent. (Next time perhaps be rather less demanding and rather more polite if you require assistance)

To an extent we agree with you. Of course what ever we do there will be a large number of people complaining it isn't correct; not enough news, not enough content in the news, not enough progress, not enough new features, too many new features. Frankly if posting news was as simple a task as posting a reply on the forum then perhaps it would happen more often. Currently, with the rapid approach of the first MTA built upon the new core there are lots of changes in the works to go with it, the aforementioned mod developers portal, a new site back and front end and policies regarding it, along with some necessary internal reorganisation within the Team itself that is ongoing, and more. 'Empty' news posts have been discussed and rejected by us, bloggs have been discussed, both individual and Team. Basically the release of the first Next Generation MTA won't only mark a turning point in the client/server, but the entire 'Organisation' of MTA itself.

Personally I think a setup similar to 0.5's GTA3 support would be most suitable. For the initial deathmatch mod we shall probably design gameplay around an initial area, player spawns, vehicles etc, yet leave access to the rest of the map open. Players then have the option to explore should they so wish. In our experience theres always the urge to wander the entire map. wether there are vehicles placed there or not (gta3mta0.3b, mtavc 0.1, dodo in mta0.4 portland, mta0.5 gta3)

So initially you want news posts, any news posts about anythign no matter how minor, yet when we make some major announcements they are ripped to pieces and theres complaints that they don't contain enough information. See the hypocracy?

Haha, I like the 'stuck on you' idea, a little like being handcuffed. Could be fun

TechniK.EXE, do you have the right thread? I guess you missed the posts too sobeat Some fairly major reveals are on the site mike, perhaps you caught some hints of them on irc and had hoped for or expected them, or perhaps you paid scant attention or didnt view the page at all, I certainly don't pay any attention to other modifications sites so that would make sense but for the majority it is fresh information.

Because you had two warnings on the old one, obvious really.

This is supposed to be a thread for a competition, keep it that way and take your off topic posts elsewhere please. Thanks.

No, and in what way is this related to General MTA discussion? MOVED

You seem to have missed the news post a few days ago that revealed a lot of previously unknown information, and the later forum posts and replies by us in regards to it that revealed and expanded a little more.