zerb

I dont see why it shouldnt be sold on the PS2 platform. VC for the PS2 was one of the best selling games of all time on that console and it also topped that years most purchased game anyway. Rockstar should certainly expand their sales interest by marketing the game onto the PS2 because of the high profits they made from the original relase.

It would be nice aswell to perhaps have more variety gameplay included, though its too earlyer to predict or judge upon because nothings been said. LCS wasnt exactly something amazing even though the usage of new features were limited, the gameplay was still there to experience. VC FTW! =P

http://www.gtagaming.com/images/news/vcsboxart.jpg This is what has been reviled on GTAGaming and probably on other GTA websites around. The biker seems to be an identical gang member from Mitch Bakers gang from the original vice. The man on the left seems to look like Diaz but a few years younger, though i think i have seen a similar face before or im probably just too thick to remember seeing him somewhere. The bloke in the tuxedo, Tommy can wear a similar one ingame and also in my boxset inside cover his wearing the exact same one. Maybe thats him a few years older or just totally different person? The girls, well _maybe_ a Merchades on the right, see became quite quiet later on within the original version, a return perhaps. These are just random comments ive just thought out of my head eh.

I dont understand too well what you've written, though it could just be me being too tired, but i would normally just think of something creative to mix well with whatever map ive created eh.

A. Nope. Q. Is Solide overweight? >;-o

The map looks fine. The CNN newsflash was rather entertaining for a few seconds ;-p

Both will do fine and it will show a good concept of how good your map might be, since i havent seen it aswell as many others. Screenshots just show people some details of the map and objects they will face against. I suggest adding some screenshots and include a short video of yourself playing on the map to just show the public how good the map might be.

Thats showing you the latest development of the deathmatch version, which you will eventually play within the future. The videos are showing you the QA team playing with the latest alpha's.

The video is good, better then looking at the screenshots i suppose. The jumps are the best part of the video from what i see, too bad that the ending seems to be landing onto the bridge. Maybe with more acceleration you can actually fly over the bridge, causing a nice crashing ending for your vehicle or having the skills to land correctly.

The map does look quite challenging and something which makes you want to prove that you can beat the toughest of skills which come in your way. I havent seen the video yet but the screenshots do show a glimpse of how difficult the map can be.

Theres no pedrestrains getting involved so i dont really understand how is can be stupid, as long as you have control of the vehicle then your fine. If your looking it at as in a real life situation then i must agree with you it is stupid because its a higher chance of causing a blinding accident for yourself or even death, its obviously not that hard to figure out. I dont really see any point in adding more weapons to be used in drive-by combinations because its just spoiling the game. We should be pleased that drive-bys will be available for us to play around with come the release of the future versions.

0.5.1 wont be released on the old core, which is used to play 0.5 and previous versions. Future VC versions are very likely to be developed on the new core BLUE in the coming future. For now though SA is the main priority for development.

The plane stunts are very impressive, thumbs up to yourself mate.

ROAR

Apart from their sports games everything else dosent seem to attract me into purchasing or even playing a demo sample. They certainly do make reasonable graphics for the PS2 console though.

To begin with its disrespecting the EULA and its taking an advantage over those who want to play fairly. Im not going to be an idiot and explain methods of cheating (even though i dont know how) and/or what glitches can occur, though players do gradually find ways into changing or modifying files which then causes them to cheat. 0.5 is one example and its not rare to see people doing it.

Some players may like the experience by adding more weapons onto their current status to produce a harder impact on an opponent because of the different sets of weapons they might have within their selection. Im on the same line as you about the interest of face paced movement within any deathmatch game and i do feel the best of gameplay can come through that style of action. Spawnwars for example dosent give really much any chance of best survival when they play as an individual, though i do enjoy them because of the fast paced action and limit of time to think of your next move with alot of players fighting around that specific area. Every so often you may be limited in the number of bullets you have left and the only way to reload them is to kill any player or find any pickup location. Adding ammunition availability into the game will give players a few short seconds to decide what weapons they would like to ride along with, giving them the best chance of survival.

Ive never experienced EA ever actually developing a poor sport game, however there are a few certain games within the EA sports industry which have showed a disadvantage in maintaining a good gameplay experience. I dont see the reason in voting because ive never adapted to any good NFL game, even though i did purchase Madden 2003 for myself and tried to so an interest within the actual sport. The game never attracted me into buying future versions which are out today. I would rather spend my cash on a half decent rugby game rather then any NFL series additions.

A. The size of you will fill half of those seats up by a double, i suggest more ;-p Q. Who wants to drive?

Just be a fair player and keep your head up, theres nothing within the game which you can make a fool out of yourself. Keep away from cheating or any kinds of modifications which can give you any advantage by unfair gameplay and you should be fine.

The overall performance in that video was great. The introduction is nicely created to get anyone into watching the video. The music and other misc things which were included in the video was also adapted well from my opinion.

Similar suggestions can already be played through scripts and gives players that role-playing experience through RPG gameplay, you might already know that if you have played previous MTA versions and/or 0.5. If this similar RPG simulator mode was developed as a new version or just accessible through the SDK creation then im sure the RPG community of fans would be interested and it would give them a more wide range experience rather then playing of the scripts. Even though the ideas are quite common, i would rather just turn on single player instead of playing multiplayer with that kind of simulator.

Action Man

I would rather use the word " securing " then capturing, though not for the mode's game. The idea sounds quite neat and interesting concept towards a different style of play. You would also have to consider what other options and rules would be available in this mode. - What happens when a player dies, can they respawn? - Is there a limited amount of spray available? - Could the admin raise the number of tags available to fight for? These are just default questions as an example of how far this mode could developed into etc.

I thought the same also, though from the texture of that ground it obviously does not look like a football (soccer) pitch, unless the texture of the ground has been changed or its at another structure. The boots seem to be the main objective towards finding out what the picture actually is and i dont even know where to start to suggest what the other surroundings of the image are. The white pants could also represent the socks for example also. The angle of the picture from what i see is hard to describe because i dont know if the guy is on the floor or running.