Toreno Posted January 5, 2005 Author Share Posted January 5, 2005 well sorry about that then CE Eagle, but im just a GTAT fan, i don't know much about coding and stuff. Link to comment
Scar Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 well sorry about that then CE Eagle, but im just a GTAT fan, i don't know much about coding and stuff. More like a fan of any gta mod which isn't mta? Link to comment
Toreno Posted January 7, 2005 Author Share Posted January 7, 2005 well no, at least not all i prefer GTAT at the moment, and soon another project which im going to betatest for. Link to comment
orappa Posted January 7, 2005 Share Posted January 7, 2005 well no, at least not all i prefer GTAT at the moment, and soon another project which im going to betatest for. How come you prefer another project which you haven't even tested yet? Link to comment
Guest Posted January 7, 2005 Share Posted January 7, 2005 well no, at least not all i prefer GTAT at the moment, and soon another project which im going to betatest for. How come you prefer another project which you haven't even tested yet? its the new trend? Link to comment
Toreno Posted January 7, 2005 Author Share Posted January 7, 2005 well, im very close to the production, and i can see the progress. Link to comment
[XYZ_ABC_123]Deckard Posted January 7, 2005 Share Posted January 7, 2005 I cannot comprehend why everyone is getting so worked up in this posting- as far as I can make out, all {DBC} Lance was trying to do was make public some of the latest developments in the Vice City Multiplayer arena. There is no reason to go on an all out flame-fest. It's pathetic really. Fair enough, you prefer MTA (so do I as it happens), but that doesn't give you the right to act like bratty 5 year olds. Surely everyone wants decent multiplayer support for the GTA series. So why then do you all insist on crapping all over the people who are trying to make it happen, just because they aren't part of the project of your preference? GTAT might not playable in the way that you would wish, and MTA might not have had much visible progress, but that's because they are Beta versions, developed by people giving up their own free time. Developers like DracoBlue and Eai aren't providing you a service, they are allowing you the privelige of using GTA in a multiplayer context in return for constructive critical feedback If you are dissatisfied by the slow progress of coding groups like these or the lack of features that you wish to use then you should not be using the program or posting in these forums. Basically put up or shut up- if you think you can do a better job then by all means go ahead and do so. My opinion (and that is all it is, an opinion, which I am entitled to) is that Vice City multiplayer will become less important in half a year or so. The more work done on developing multiplayer and other mods for VC and GTA3 in these coming months the better, as it will better prepare us all for when San Andreas finally rolls around. We should all do our best to positively encourage these developments, be they in the form of GTAT, GTA:C or MTA:VC, not crap all over them in pathetic flame wars. Link to comment
Toreno Posted January 25, 2005 Author Share Posted January 25, 2005 well said Deckard, there isn't much left for me to say also draco, just wondering, why does it take so long? the site is down for almost a month now? Link to comment
Iggy Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 I can't believe some of the shit i've seen you guys saying in this thread, some of you are just way to stupid to comprehend how hard it is to make a mp mod. Like i've seen said before, MAKE ONE YOURSELF, and make sure it's better then mta or gta t, then you can talk bad about each other, please, do NOT say one mod sucks or on mod is better, there both buggy, and they both have there problems, but sure, I bet one or the other is better in certain areas, but this is why they are in their BETA stage. Link to comment
StAnToN Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Deckard has just said what he thought and it nearly matches your post iggy what was the point? Link to comment
Toreno Posted January 26, 2005 Author Share Posted January 26, 2005 (edited) well because some ppl dont understand, like you. i think its the worst pile of sh*it i have downloaded in my whole life! you said that a while ago, but you couldn't lead a project yourself. begging the mta team for help and stuff. Like i've seen said before, MAKE ONE YOURSELF, and make sure it's better then mta or gta t, then you can talk bad about each other, Edited July 29, 2005 by Guest Link to comment
Iggy Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Stanton: I hadn't even read his post before I posted mine, this is a forum, I believe I have the right to share my opinion also. Link to comment
[XYZ_ABC_123]Deckard Posted January 27, 2005 Share Posted January 27, 2005 Stanton: I hadn't even read his post before I posted mine, this is a forum, I believe I have the right to share my opinion also. It's a good thing Iggy posted as his opinion should carry more weight and credibility than mine anyway (due to being a Moderator and, well, Iggy ) Link to comment
xerox Posted January 29, 2005 Share Posted January 29, 2005 finally iggy has hit it on the head btw - what is the latest on gtaT - seems draco has been VERY quiet as of late Link to comment
Posty Posted January 29, 2005 Share Posted January 29, 2005 finally iggy has hit it on the headbtw - what is the latest on gtaT - seems draco has been VERY quiet as of late Draco was busy with the university and more. He's had outside life you know. And being the single coder for GtaT, he doesnt have a lot of time to work on it, but he's still coding what he can. Link to comment
orappa Posted January 29, 2005 Share Posted January 29, 2005 finally iggy has hit it on the headbtw - what is the latest on gtaT - seems draco has been VERY quiet as of late Draco was busy with the university and more. He's had outside life you know. And being the single coder for GtaT, he doesnt have a lot of time to work on it, but he's still coding what he can. It's always puzzled me - why doesn't he recruit extra team members? Link to comment
Capone Posted January 29, 2005 Share Posted January 29, 2005 gtat is a 1 man team ? wow Link to comment
StAnToN Posted January 29, 2005 Share Posted January 29, 2005 Kudos to him though for making it on his own... Link to comment
Toreno Posted January 29, 2005 Author Share Posted January 29, 2005 lol thanks for spreading lies...........................its not true. i asked him the same question, there are some other coders in the team, their names will be published as soon as 0.5f has been released. but you know, hes the main coder. Link to comment
Toreno Posted January 31, 2005 Author Share Posted January 31, 2005 The server had a bugged version of phpBB 2 on it.So my admin closed the website until I edit this page. But I never received a mail from him, so probably my mail account was hacked. Currently there is a problem with my login pwd, when he sends me the new password the website will be back up and running. Sorry, for the circumstances, I think it will not take so long. ... Cu, Draco full topic: http://dracoblue.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?t=46 Link to comment
Gareth Posted February 7, 2005 Share Posted February 7, 2005 this mod stops you from playing single player Link to comment
Toreno Posted February 7, 2005 Author Share Posted February 7, 2005 thats why they've included backup files...............and the team is going to include a small menu , in which you can choose between GTAT multiplayer or just singleplayer why would we have to think of it?gtat went from pretty nice, but not really great to very sucky (i still prefer gtat0.3 over 0.5) and i play mta, cause it has playersand it's good playable heh mta went from pretty nice (0.3r2) , till not very great(mta 0.4.1), till very sucky(mta 0.5) draco(and the gtat team) realised that the old core couldn't handle it any more, so they started creating a new one( i hope they can tell us more when the site is back up again). And Maybe mta 0.5.1 will be a bit more stable, but they cant fix some big issues, thats because of the core. Link to comment
Gareth Posted February 7, 2005 Share Posted February 7, 2005 well the mta team are also working on a new core. its called mta blue its going to be out this year Link to comment
orappa Posted February 7, 2005 Share Posted February 7, 2005 heh mta went from pretty nice (0.3r2) , till not very great(mta 0.4.1), till very sucky(mta 0.5) I happen to like 0.5. I played GTA3 first and then I heard everyone saying VC DM was utter crap so I stuck with GTA3 for a while. I still had fun when I played VC and couldn't really see what the fuss was about, but then again I never play as Robber. Link to comment
Toreno Posted February 7, 2005 Author Share Posted February 7, 2005 yeah gta3 is ok,(shoresidevale that is). but blowing up the gta3 engine doesn't sound good to me. and the problem is with vice city deathmatch, almost every thing that worked well in mta 0.3r2 is gone(its not just the robber). Yeah i know about blue, but MTA 0.5 required some spare time too, and the results aren't that great(hopefully mta 0.5.1 will change this though, maybe the thought that mta 0.4.1 was a good patch for mta 0.4 helps). working with an old core for too long is a bad idea. I mean take a look at gtat 0.5(x), the team was able to fix some issues, but some still exists(the lag caused by spawned cars). Link to comment
Recommended Posts