Lággy Posted December 7, 2005 Posted December 7, 2005 Hi I remember that the mta news said that they were working on the next (not blue) release (click here for the page). What happened? Thanks
xGj Posted December 8, 2005 Posted December 8, 2005 HiI remember that the mta news said that they were working on the next (not blue) release (click here for the page). What happened? Thanks For the 1000000000000000st time: They wont work with the current core as it is too laggy and unstable. They wont release any more versions on it. MTASA r1 will be built on the BLUE core ( the new one ) ..
Kent747 Posted December 8, 2005 Posted December 8, 2005 we've pretty much abandoned that core, the developers who worked on 0.5 were not working on blue, and alot of those members have become inactive. as a result the majority of our team is now focused on blue, and we don't have time to focus on that old core. Kent Simon's Amazing Cross Language Hello World Program!! #include #define print printf#define caller void main(){#define ref }caller ;print ("Hello World!\n");ref;
{Static} Posted December 8, 2005 Posted December 8, 2005 I'm not sure if you came to a final decision on this, but will any versions of the old core be released as source?
erorr404 Posted December 8, 2005 Posted December 8, 2005 HiI remember that the mta news said that they were working on the next (not blue) release (click here for the page). What happened? Thanks For the 1000000000000000st time: They wont work with the current core as it is too laggy and unstable. They wont release any more versions on it. MTASA r1 will be built on the BLUE core ( the new one ) .. don't be such an asshole. i would be asking the same thing if i was new to the community and didn't see any official news on 0.5.
Kent747 Posted December 8, 2005 Posted December 8, 2005 I'm not sure if you came to a final decision on this, but will any versions of the old core be released as source? probably not Kent Simon's Amazing Cross Language Hello World Program!! #include #define print printf#define caller void main(){#define ref }caller ;print ("Hello World!\n");ref;
Vicer/Spitfire Posted December 8, 2005 Posted December 8, 2005 Talidan posted a suggestion before regarding 0.5.x, so I shall post it and wonder if you will consider it after R1. Scrap MTAVC and develop GTA3:MTA and maximize the old core's potential as a lot can be done to it.
xGj Posted December 8, 2005 Posted December 8, 2005 HiI remember that the mta news said that they were working on the next (not blue) release (click here for the page). What happened? Thanks For the 1000000000000000st time: They wont work with the current core as it is too laggy and unstable. They wont release any more versions on it. MTASA r1 will be built on the BLUE core ( the new one ) .. don't be such an asshole. i would be asking the same thing if i was new to the community and didn't see any official news on 0.5. Im not acting like an asshole, I just cleared it up.
MrJax Posted December 8, 2005 Posted December 8, 2005 Talidan posted a suggestion before regarding 0.5.x, so I shall post it and wonder if you will consider it after R1.Scrap MTAVC and develop GTA3:MTA and maximize the old core's potential as a lot can be done to it. What would be the point in working on an old core? Do you realise how aggravating working on an old project would be when you know far you've come and much you've learnt since? A better suggestion would be to one day try and support VC and GTA3 in blue
xGj Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 Talidan posted a suggestion before regarding 0.5.x, so I shall post it and wonder if you will consider it after R1.Scrap MTAVC and develop GTA3:MTA and maximize the old core's potential as a lot can be done to it. What would be the point in working on an old core? Do you realise how aggravating working on an old project would be when you know far you've come and much you've learnt since? A better suggestion would be to one day try and support VC and GTA3 in blue 100 % agreed. What about the GTA3 support in the future anyway? Will it support it? As I know the BLUE core was actually developed for VC I bet it will work with it after some changes. It wasn't developed for GTA3 tho so what about it?
MTA Team jhxp Posted December 9, 2005 MTA Team Posted December 9, 2005 Depends on, if the community wants it or not. If there will be a need for it, then who knows... One of the [VCP] leaders // honorary member of the =PCP= gang. Do not PM me your MTA:SA Client / Server support questions, Lua scripting questions, unban requests or server toplist concerns - please ask them here: MTA:SA Support subforum, here: Scripting subforum, here: Ban appeals or here: Servers instead. For other inquiries - please expect delays in replies when messaging me.
Vicer/Spitfire Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 Talidan posted a suggestion before regarding 0.5.x, so I shall post it and wonder if you will consider it after R1.Scrap MTAVC and develop GTA3:MTA and maximize the old core's potential as a lot can be done to it. What would be the point in working on an old core? Do you realise how aggravating working on an old project would be when you know far you've come and much you've learnt since? A better suggestion would be to one day try and support VC and GTA3 in blue Don't roll your eyes at me Jax . The point is that lots of things are capable with the old core and GTA3. VC didn't quite work out with the old core, so why not try its chances with GTA3?
MrJax Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 Because of what i said? People don't make these things purely to bring fun to others, thats just a huge plus, they do it because they find it fun themself, and going backwards and working on something inferior is not fun.
Omg Posted December 10, 2005 Posted December 10, 2005 Because of what i said? People don't make these things purely to bring fun to others, thats just a huge plus, they do it because they find it fun themself, and going backwards and working on something inferior is not fun. Hehe so does that mean that producers, produce/maufacture goods for themselves as they find it fun to produce and not give crap about consumers, but if consumers like the stuff its just a huge plus ? Right? Warning:Please refrain from using word OMG , Use OMFG instead. Confuses me when people use OMG in their replies/posts.
MAD_BOY Posted December 10, 2005 Posted December 10, 2005 Because of what i said? People don't make these things purely to bring fun to others, thats just a huge plus, they do it because they find it fun themself, and going backwards and working on something inferior is not fun. Hehe so does that mean that producers, produce/maufacture goods for themselves as they find it fun to produce and not give crap about consumers, but if consumers like the stuff its just a huge plus ? Right? well, that is completely true for ID software Official B.L.A.S.T.Addict [VCP] forever
MrJax Posted December 10, 2005 Posted December 10, 2005 Because of what i said? People don't make these things purely to bring fun to others, thats just a huge plus, they do it because they find it fun themself, and going backwards and working on something inferior is not fun. Hehe so does that mean that producers, produce/maufacture goods for themselves as they find it fun to produce and not give crap about consumers, but if consumers like the stuff its just a huge plus ? Right? Um, there's just a slight difference there, they get paid.
xGj Posted December 10, 2005 Posted December 10, 2005 They do it for the community and for themselves. I can understand it gives a good feeling to accomplish something and the community likes your work
Recommended Posts