orappa Posted August 9, 2005 Share Posted August 9, 2005 (edited) I don't have a problem with it. What made you think people would? Edited August 19, 2005 by Guest Link to comment
Vicer/Spitfire Posted August 9, 2005 Author Share Posted August 9, 2005 Its animated for a start. I haven't seen that much people here with an animated sig. And the own3d thing would make people... i dunno can't think of the word I'm thinking of Link to comment
Gamefreek Posted August 9, 2005 Share Posted August 9, 2005 Nothing really wrong with it, no porn or extreme gore. But it depends on if the mods will allow it.. Link to comment
-chronic- Posted August 9, 2005 Share Posted August 9, 2005 yeah, last time I used an animated siggy, they removed it cuz it was JUST under the size limit, but the resolution was under the limit too, so i don't know... i gave up on good sigs at this forum... Link to comment
orappa Posted August 9, 2005 Share Posted August 9, 2005 (edited) It might be a bit hefty for 56k users. It'll take them about 17 secs to download, so you might want to see if you can shave off a couple of KB's here and there. Edited August 19, 2005 by Guest Link to comment
Leviathan Posted August 10, 2005 Share Posted August 10, 2005 The reason is why you don't see much animated ones is becouse the limit. Keeping in mind the slow internet users. After I had finished my super animated one I couldn't use it here becouse of the limit, then I started my current one. Link to comment
Noobi3 Posted August 10, 2005 Share Posted August 10, 2005 No problem..... Unless one of us is the son of that poor woman she must be rich now after sueing the company Link to comment
MTA Team Blokker_1999 Posted August 10, 2005 MTA Team Share Posted August 10, 2005 That sig is not allowed. If it was you in the sig you woudn't want it to be spread either Link to comment
Mike Posted August 10, 2005 Share Posted August 10, 2005 Then why'd she send it into "You've been framed"? Link to comment
Leviathan Posted August 10, 2005 Share Posted August 10, 2005 Hmm I think Bam Margera or some other jackass guy would use this as their sig if it were themselves on it... Link to comment
Black Dragon Posted August 11, 2005 Share Posted August 11, 2005 pfft that picture is SO spread out i actually saw it on tv a couple of times (worlds funniest videos, methinks). not allowing it because it offends the already multi-offended woman? thats just stupid. p.s. dont kill me blokker ^^; Link to comment
orappa Posted August 11, 2005 Share Posted August 11, 2005 (edited) I have to agree - that picture is already on the internet, although that doesn't mean that we should automatically accept it either. Edited August 19, 2005 by Guest Link to comment
-chronic- Posted August 11, 2005 Share Posted August 11, 2005 That sig is not allowed. are u kidding?! i gave up on good sigs at this forum for a damn good reason... Link to comment
MTA Team Blokker_1999 Posted August 13, 2005 MTA Team Share Posted August 13, 2005 to big Link to comment
Ransom Posted August 13, 2005 Share Posted August 13, 2005 pfft that picture is SO spread out i actually saw it on tv a couple of times (worlds funniest videos, methinks). not allowing it because it offends the already multi-offended woman? thats just stupid.p.s. dont kill me blokker ^^; yea comeon.. i guess if u havent seen it b4 i get ur decision but I too have seen this tons of times. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now