sajj Posted January 8, 2012 Posted January 8, 2012 Its would be good to have a feature that players are able to rate servers. like add a command exemple: /rateserver 3.5 and then the rates are counted and every server have its rate exemple: 5.2/10. and the rating appear near servers name in the browser. discuss
12p Posted January 8, 2012 Posted January 8, 2012 This is a very good idea. +1 Though the only problem would be that some haters are gonna rank everything 0/10, and other haters gonna rate some few servers 0/10, and some just gonna give 10/10 for the sake of doing it. Maybe a specified group only could rate them via web?
DizAster Posted January 8, 2012 Posted January 8, 2012 Cool idea. Well yeah, the problem with haters is difficult, but this can be solved by making rate ability available only to people that are logged in MTA (in that "community" center).
Slim. Posted January 9, 2012 Posted January 9, 2012 Errrr, Listen.. the community might take a BIG risk by adding this suggestion.. let me show you an example: Example 1 :- XYZ Player has joined the game. XYZ: Wow, Nice server.. ima rate it 10/10 ! Example 2 :- ABC Has joined the game. ABC: ┼♠²╜Ω6►87╪6 !! ? !WDOASHOAS ? QRS: ENGLISH IN THE MAINCHAT! PLEASE. ABC: QUE? ME NO INGISH ME GIVE SERVER 1/ 10 FAK OFFFF!!!11111 You see, that's the problem..
ChaseOquinn Posted January 9, 2012 Posted January 9, 2012 This is a nice suggestion and about the haters thing that wont be a problem because the people that actually like the server will out weigh the haters.
karlis Posted January 10, 2012 Posted January 10, 2012 This is a nice suggestion and about the haters thing that wont be a problem because the people that actually like the server will out weigh the haters. not always... well haters will be enough to spoil any good rating for sake of it, especially russians, arrabs or other big "communities" that interact with themselves only. I remember having a 3x streak of 1/5 ratings in community for my ivhud resource just because i just reached top rated resource.
12p Posted January 10, 2012 Posted January 10, 2012 Maybe a specified group only could rate them via web? Not community...
CapY Posted January 10, 2012 Posted January 10, 2012 Do you guys ever read Mantis, this feature was suggested few months ago, and is planned for 1.3: http://bugs.mtasa.com/view.php?id=6337
Otto Posted January 10, 2012 Posted January 10, 2012 Not by command, probably show five stars next to the slots (0/32 for example) and users will click from 1 to 5. It would be nice yes. Best rated servers should have extra things.
karlis Posted January 10, 2012 Posted January 10, 2012 imo there should be restriction of rating only if you play for 20minutes or so...
codeluaeveryday Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 I think it would be better rated by amount of joins. Like gametracker, they have server ranks, aka, a server always has the most players, and have received the most activity, they are ranked one. Base it on amount of connects which the server have received.
Oz. Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 The amount of connects a server receives is not always indicative of the quality of the server.
CapY Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 http://bugs.mtasa.com/view.php?id=6337 Obviously i have to link it twice.
12p Posted January 12, 2012 Posted January 12, 2012 http://bugs.mtasa.com/view.php?id=6337Obviously i have to link it twice. I know it's disappointing but you don't have to be so mad because of that
B3LL1C Posted January 14, 2012 Posted January 14, 2012 nice idea hey connect here PRO|Race 24/7 1.2 mtasa://64.120.47.66:22003 note? 1-10 ?
AGENT_STEELMEAT Posted January 14, 2012 Posted January 14, 2012 This feature already exists - it's called playercount. By having a nice server, you attract players. Rather than beg and beg for votes on this rating system, servers should focus on bringing innovative features of gameplay to attract players. The product they put out should speak for itself, not the amount of votes they manage to garner (both legitimately and otherwise).
DizAster Posted January 14, 2012 Posted January 14, 2012 This feature already exists - it's called playercount.By having a nice server, you attract players. Rather than beg and beg for votes on this rating system, servers should focus on bringing innovative features of gameplay to attract players. The product they put out should speak for itself, not the amount of votes they manage to garner (both legitimately and otherwise). It's not exactly like that. I've seen servers that use scripts from the community and get more players than original good servers such as SAUR. Furthermore there was a server called "Default MTA Server" which didn't had any scripts and it used to get 40 players sometimes 50. So I think MTA needs this feature.
12p Posted January 14, 2012 Posted January 14, 2012 This feature already exists - it's called playercount.By having a nice server, you attract players. Rather than beg and beg for votes on this rating system, servers should focus on bringing innovative features of gameplay to attract players. The product they put out should speak for itself, not the amount of votes they manage to garner (both legitimately and otherwise). Zombies Extincion Latino SHITTTY SERVER, SHITTY SCRIPTS, SHITTY CONCEPT, SHITTY PLAYERS!
TheGuyNL Posted February 4, 2012 Posted February 4, 2012 Rating is complete idiot idea if someone just could click 5 stars without even playing on the server. A player only should be able to rate a certain server if he/she registers and plays on the server for a while. If not a server could bomb another server with the lowest rating, so it get's lost in the server list.
sora+ Posted February 4, 2012 Posted February 4, 2012 "How many people added the server to their favourites determines the server's rating" seems like a good idea to me.
ZPC2THLgate Posted June 14, 2013 Posted June 14, 2013 I think this suggestion is better. __________________________________________________________ Zopo Mobile Shop ZOPO ZP900S ZOPO ZP100
Recommended Posts