Kosmo Posted September 9, 2008 Posted September 9, 2008 Object limit?! Never heard of an object limit in mta dm or at least i never heard that any map has reached it^^ Ah that's even better. I just heard that the limit was about 3500 or something. Guess I shouldn't trust people's word for it
Scarface Posted September 9, 2008 Posted September 9, 2008 Object limit?! Never heard of an object limit in mta dm or at least i never heard that any map has reached it^^ Ah that's even better. I just heard that the limit was about 3500 or something. Guess I shouldn't trust people's word for it ya some even said it was 1337 , i dont think they improved it, mtaqa test server we were testing on had the limit of 128, even so its a waste of time, the maximum players ive seen in mta in one server were 50
lil Toady Posted September 10, 2008 Posted September 10, 2008 The total mta elements limit is around 65535. You can fill that by objects, but there's some gta limit for the number of objects in one area. Though in dp3 the local objects limit should not bother you much as the new streamer makes sure you have the closest objects in game. Do not PM me, im not going to read it anyway.
Scarface Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 Oh and now that i came across it, there is this thing if you press the right mouse button for like 10 seconds it closes mta to your desktop
Gamesnert Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 Oh and now that i came across it, there is this thing if you press the right mouse button for like 10 seconds it closes mta to your desktop Is that a bug? Never noticed it, and I've holded it for over 20 seconds a few times and no crash... =/ Projects: Slothbot | Maximap
Scarface Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 Oh and now that i came across it, there is this thing if you press the right mouse button for like 10 seconds it closes mta to your desktop Is that a bug? Never noticed it, and I've holded it for over 20 seconds a few times and no crash... =/ well today it happened twice, and it pissed me off cause i was gonna kill this guy
robhol Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 Never happened to me, and yes, I'm sure i have at times had the RMB down for longer than 10 seconds. Do NOT PM ME for help unless invited. - New MTA Script Editor Scripting help "etiquette": understandable language, relevant code (ALL code if unsure), [Lua] tags, error messages with line numbers. Super simple stuff.
Scarface Posted October 22, 2008 Posted October 22, 2008 Since san andreas is not used to having a REAL time meaning hours,minutes,seconds, when this is done in a server the sky flickers alot, sa-mp have already fixed that and im asking if mta will
Mr.Hankey Posted October 22, 2008 Posted October 22, 2008 Since san andreas is not used to having a REAL time meaning hours,minutes,seconds, when this is done in a server the sky flickers alot, sa-mp have already fixed that and im asking if mta will http://development.mtasa.com/index.php? ... teDuration so yes it's fixed in dp3
Scarface Posted October 28, 2008 Posted October 28, 2008 How about voice speak, like of call of duty, when pressing a key you could talk with your mic, the owner of the server will have the option the either switch it off, everyone can talk or the team only can hear, and the players can mute anyone for themselves.This could be a good idea for the future of RP servers,having the possibility not to type but speak, could also be for how many units the player is like the chat, obviously its just an idea.
robhol Posted October 28, 2008 Posted October 28, 2008 How about voice speak, like of call of duty, when pressing a key you could talk with your mic, the owner of the server will have the option the either switch it off, everyone can talk or the team only can hear, and the players can mute anyone for themselves.This could be a good idea for the future of RP servers,having the possibility not to type but speak, could also be for how many units the player is like the chat, obviously its just an idea. Irrelevant to MTA, if players want this they can use Ventrilo or another VoIP. Do NOT PM ME for help unless invited. - New MTA Script Editor Scripting help "etiquette": understandable language, relevant code (ALL code if unsure), [Lua] tags, error messages with line numbers. Super simple stuff.
Scarface Posted October 28, 2008 Posted October 28, 2008 How about voice speak, like of call of duty, when pressing a key you could talk with your mic, the owner of the server will have the option the either switch it off, everyone can talk or the team only can hear, and the players can mute anyone for themselves.This could be a good idea for the future of RP servers,having the possibility not to type but speak, could also be for how many units the player is like the chat, obviously its just an idea. Irrelevant to MTA, if players want this they can use Ventrilo or another VoIP. whats the point of using those! you cant speak to whoever in the server, abit like the voice speak if gta IV
robhol Posted October 28, 2008 Posted October 28, 2008 How about voice speak, like of call of duty, when pressing a key you could talk with your mic, the owner of the server will have the option the either switch it off, everyone can talk or the team only can hear, and the players can mute anyone for themselves.This could be a good idea for the future of RP servers,having the possibility not to type but speak, could also be for how many units the player is like the chat, obviously its just an idea. Irrelevant to MTA, if players want this they can use Ventrilo or another VoIP. whats the point of using those! you cant speak to whoever in the server, abit like the voice speak if gta IV Imagine trying to sync all the client-server-client data with tons of audio data fighting to get through on time as well. Several people also have connections that are barely enough for the game itself. Some people, (me, for example) would find it incredibly annoying, and disable it. Lots of people would speak different languages so you couldn't talk to them anyways. Not everybody has a mic/headset. Several more points. So here, loads of reason not to do it - what would be the reason to do it? Do NOT PM ME for help unless invited. - New MTA Script Editor Scripting help "etiquette": understandable language, relevant code (ALL code if unsure), [Lua] tags, error messages with line numbers. Super simple stuff.
darkdreamingdan Posted October 28, 2008 Posted October 28, 2008 Voice support was removed once already VCP FOREVER!
Gothem Posted November 8, 2008 Posted November 8, 2008 How about voice speak, like of call of duty, when pressing a key you could talk with your mic, the owner of the server will have the option the either switch it off, everyone can talk or the team only can hear, and the players can mute anyone for themselves.This could be a good idea for the future of RP servers,having the possibility not to type but speak, could also be for how many units the player is like the chat, obviously its just an idea. Imagine trying to sync all the client-server-client data with tons of audio data fighting to get through on time as well. Several people also have connections that are barely enough for the game itself. Some people, (me, for example) would find it incredibly annoying, and disable it. Lots of people would speak different languages so you couldn't talk to them anyways. Not everybody has a mic/headset. Several more points. So here, loads of reason not to do it - what would be the reason to do it? and what about the country servers? how scarface says. the server owner will like if he turn it on or off
Scarface Posted December 2, 2008 Posted December 2, 2008 Imagine trying to sync all the client-server-client data with tons of audio data fighting to get through on time as well. Several people also have connections that are barely enough for the game itself. Some people, (me, for example) would find it incredibly annoying, and disable it. Lots of people would speak different languages so you couldn't talk to them anyways. Not everybody has a mic/headset. Several more points. So here, loads of reason not to do it - what would be the reason to do it? well if i understood you right you mean soemthing like msn talk, but what i mean is a push-to-talk voice
Gamesnert Posted December 2, 2008 Posted December 2, 2008 well if i understood you right you mean soemthing like msn talk, but what i mean is a push-to-talk voice Although that matters quite a bit, it doesn't matter. It still costs quite much bandwidth to send the data client-server-clients. It uses valuable bandwidth that could be used for much better synch, better scripts or more players. Besides, aren't there server-hosting places where you need to pay for bandwidth? Besides, I personally don't see the use anyway. If you still want it, use an external application. Projects: Slothbot | Maximap
Scarface Posted December 3, 2008 Posted December 3, 2008 well if i understood you right you mean soemthing like msn talk, but what i mean is a push-to-talk voice Although that matters quite a bit, it doesn't matter. It still costs quite much bandwidth to send the data client-server-clients. It uses valuable bandwidth that could be used for much better synch, better scripts or more players. Besides, aren't there server-hosting places where you need to pay for bandwidth? Besides, I personally don't see the use anyway. If you still want it, use an external application. This idea should be mainly used locally, meaning users living close to each other, but could also be of very far away too, thats why there should be an option for it.
Gamesnert Posted December 3, 2008 Posted December 3, 2008 This idea should be mainly used locally, meaning users living close to each other, but could also be of very far away too, thats why there should be an option for it. You're basically saying that only people living close should be allowed to, but yet people from far away should be able to too. What's the difference? =/ Besides, still does NOT solve the bandwidth problem. It still needs to go from client to server to multiple others. Devs & open sources could better focus on the bugs, synch and features that don't have such a big downside IMO. Later on, in version... 9941364631343136435484 or something... It could be added. But there's more to do than only this... =/ Projects: Slothbot | Maximap
Scarface Posted December 3, 2008 Posted December 3, 2008 This idea should be mainly used locally, meaning users living close to each other, but could also be of very far away too, thats why there should be an option for it. You're basically saying that only people living close should be allowed to, but yet people from far away should be able to too. What's the difference? =/ Besides, still does NOT solve the bandwidth problem. It still needs to go from client to server to multiple others. Devs & open sources could better focus on the bugs, synch and features that don't have such a big downside IMO. Later on, in version... 9941364631343136435484 or something... It could be added. But there's more to do than only this... =/ This is just a feature, im not saying that the devs should work on this instead of bugs.
Guest Posted April 3, 2009 Posted April 3, 2009 I'm very happy with all coming ideas, but i want especially alt+tab, without minimating its very very very very sad.
lil Toady Posted April 4, 2009 Posted April 4, 2009 I'm very happy with all coming ideas, but i want especially alt+tab, without minimating its very very very very sad. Alt+tab support has been added not long ago Do not PM me, im not going to read it anyway.
skybon Posted April 4, 2009 Posted April 4, 2009 I'm very happy with all coming ideas, but i want especially alt+tab, without minimating its very very very very sad. Alt+tab support has been added not long ago Available since r546. Windows 7 Build 7068 x64
Recommended Posts