Killing Posted February 1, 2005 Posted February 1, 2005 The freebsd compile has be done on a 5.3 box with dynamic libs and hence will only run on a 5.3 unfortunately we are not in a position to upgrade our 100+ machines to 5.3 so require a 5.2 compile. Should be just a quick recompile. If you dont have a box to do this one feel free to contact me.
Nutz Posted February 1, 2005 Posted February 1, 2005 The freebsd compile has be done on a 5.3 box with dynamic libs and hence will only run on a 5.3 unfortunately we are not in a position to upgrade our 100+ machines to 5.3 so require a 5.2 compile. Should be just a quick recompile. If you dont have a box to do this one feel free to contact me. If you are running 5.2 (not even 5.2.1?) mta is the least of your concerns. Are the dependencies all gcc related? If so you may be able to install a newer version of gcc to make it work.
Killing Posted February 2, 2005 Author Posted February 2, 2005 5.2.1 on the majority but some are 5.1 the error is: ./MTAServer /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libm.so.3" not found
eAi Posted February 2, 2005 Posted February 2, 2005 We'll look into this for our next release which should be within a couple of days. eAi
«Makaveli» Posted February 2, 2005 Posted February 2, 2005 LeIK@! 1omgfgh! NExxtTD reliaese IN C APcoule daty?!? OMFG !11one! MTA BleU! &7and
Killing Posted February 2, 2005 Author Posted February 2, 2005 We'll look into this for our next release which should be within a couple of days. eAi Thanks for that if you need access to an account to compile on just shout.
ijsf Posted February 2, 2005 Posted February 2, 2005 The compiling has been done on a FreeBSD 5.3 machine. We migth set up a 5.2 machine for the next release. If someone needs a <5.2 binary, please post.
orappa Posted February 2, 2005 Posted February 2, 2005 LeIK@! 1omgfgh! NExxtTD reliaese IN C APcoule daty?!? OMFG !11one!MTA BleU! &7and Next server release. And no, it's not Blue, it's a patch for 0.5.
MTA Team Blokker_1999 Posted February 2, 2005 MTA Team Posted February 2, 2005 LeIK@! 1omgfgh! NExxtTD reliaese IN C APcoule daty?!? OMFG !11one!MTA BleU! &7and Next server release. And no, it's not Blue, it's a patch for 0.5. The next release will be a new server version. This is to patch some stability issues and the major memory leak we are having.
Guest Posted April 1, 2005 Posted April 1, 2005 Is there any plans to provide ether (preferred) source or (grudgingly) binaries to allow for gcc2 users to run a server? Currently my hardware is a mix of Fbsd 4.10 and DragonflyBSD 1.1. Thanks.
Guest Posted April 11, 2005 Posted April 11, 2005 We have a gcc2.95 compiled version. I think he was pointing in the direction of source code, not binaries.
Slothman Posted April 12, 2005 Posted April 12, 2005 then he will be dissapointed. MTA is not open source, nor have they announced any plans to go open source in the near future. Let's not be typical linux geeks and moan about it
orappa Posted April 12, 2005 Posted April 12, 2005 then he will be dissapointed. MTA is not open source, nor have they announced any plans to go open source in the near future. Let's not be typical linux geeks and moan about it Check his post history and you'll see that most of his posts are requesting source code.
[KFC]Jupiter Posted July 22, 2005 Posted July 22, 2005 The compiling has been done on a FreeBSD 5.3 machine. We migth set up a 5.2 machine for the next release.If someone needs a <5.2 binary, please post. I need a FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE. Thanks.
[KFC]Jupiter Posted July 22, 2005 Posted July 22, 2005 I am not bumping anything, I just need it for FreeBSD 4.9
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now