Aeron Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Encryted messages or a secure line for password transfer.... eAi got a opinion? Link to comment
Oli Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 heh that would be useful for my global stats thing atm Link to comment
JacoB Posted January 7, 2005 Share Posted January 7, 2005 I agree.. encrypted messages would most likely stop those god-awful bots, depending on how random/encypted the encryption actually is. Link to comment
orappa Posted January 7, 2005 Share Posted January 7, 2005 I agree.. encrypted messages would most likely stop those god-awful bots, depending on how random/encypted the encryption actually is. All encryption is crackable. You'd have to live to about a million to crack 128-bit though, but that would take up too much bandwidth and CPU power. Link to comment
Moderators HAZJ Posted January 7, 2005 Moderators Share Posted January 7, 2005 All encryption is crackable. You'd have to live to about a million to crack 128-bit though, but that would take up too much bandwidth and CPU power. I agree with Jon, encrypting makes double work for the pc Link to comment
Aeron Posted January 8, 2005 Author Share Posted January 8, 2005 All encryption is crackable. You'd have to live to about a million to crack 128-bit though, but that would take up too much bandwidth and CPU power. I agree with Jon, encrypting makes double work for the pc Then you must not have to much spawn-whores in ur serv! Link to comment
Oli Posted January 8, 2005 Share Posted January 8, 2005 hmmm... i dont think that encryption on JUST the password transfer packets would increase comp CPU usage overall much or on the server much.. and the bandwidth would depend on the type(s) of encryption used. Link to comment
orappa Posted January 8, 2005 Share Posted January 8, 2005 Hazj misunderstood me. When I was talking about high bandwidth and CPU usage, I was referring specifically to 128-bit encryption. Link to comment
Recommended Posts