EdwardTobia Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 i have a computer with LinuxMandrake v10 on it and i downloaded the Linux Server, i double clicked it to execute it but nothing come up do enyone know why??? thnx Link to comment
MAD_BOY Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 omg, learn linux.... open it with a terminal example: you are logged in as EdwardTobia, you open a terminal lets say you extracted the server into /home/EdwardTobia/mtaserver/ then you type in the terminal: ./home/EdwardTobia/mtaserver/MTA0.4.1-server (i think MTA0.4.1-server was the name of it, if its not, change that to the right name) then the server starts with the default settings you can change the settings by editing the config.cfg (or whatever its name is, its a .cfg file that's in the package) with your favorite text editing tool Link to comment
OpiuM. Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 thats why i tell everyone to get xandros. lmfao. also, in the console, wouldnt it be 'home/eddy/Desktop/MTASERVER/0.4.1server' with the ' things? lol. Link to comment
MAD_BOY Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 no, the ' thingys aren't needed, atleast, i never used them in any distro, and it always worked Link to comment
Dawgy Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 Open your terminal. cd /home mkdir mta cd mta wget link to tar here tar -zxf name of tar cd name of tar screen ./MTAServer0.4.1 Ctrl a+d Link to comment
MAD_BOY Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 you just gave him useless stuff, he allready extracted it =/ Link to comment
EdwardTobia Posted August 28, 2004 Author Share Posted August 28, 2004 lol well im new to linux d00ds as opium knows lol il try out sum of the stuffs u told me now lol nice 1 guys Link to comment
Slothman Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 now, does anyone know for a fact that the linux server is more stable (or vice versa) i know all us unix people will just outright assume it's better on linux, but has anyone actually tested linux vs win32? Link to comment
OpiuM. Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 now, does anyone know for a fact that the linux server is more stable (or vice versa)i know all us unix people will just outright assume it's better on linux, but has anyone actually tested linux vs win32? linux uses way less CPU, therefore, the speed increses on the server. Link to comment
orappa Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 It all depends on the program really. A badly-written program will be unstable on both operating systems. Link to comment
OpiuM. Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 message to ALL noobies. ge XandrOS, it is easy to set up, and it is deh pwnage. done. lol Link to comment
MAD_BOY Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 nah, get knoppix and install it to your hd Link to comment
Dawgy Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 message to ALL noobies.ge XandrOS, it is easy to set up, and it is deh pwnage. done. lol Fedora is pretty good. Link to comment
Dawgy Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 now, does anyone know for a fact that the linux server is more stable (or vice versa)i know all us unix people will just outright assume it's better on linux, but has anyone actually tested linux vs win32? linux uses way less CPU, therefore, the speed increses on the server. Linux also seems to be less on memory usage. Link to comment
Slothman Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 yes, we all know linux is lighter on resources, but im asking if people have noticed significant changes, like less user crashes (when all users crash at once) or maybe better syncing. ps:mandrake has the best install, so damn easy (and a kickass partition tool) Link to comment
OpiuM. Posted August 30, 2004 Share Posted August 30, 2004 did you ever try XandrOS? noone has tried it and is telling me its worse then anything else. the reason i got it was to have somin nobody else had btw. (try it, it has one of the best partition tools.) Link to comment
b0b0 Posted August 31, 2004 Share Posted August 31, 2004 Plain old fdisk works for me. Link to comment
Recommended Posts