{ULK}Dome Posted May 30, 2004 Share Posted May 30, 2004 this is askin too much? can we in gta3 actually have more choices of people. like choose your look than choose ur gang? Link to comment
Slothman Posted May 30, 2004 Share Posted May 30, 2004 i believe this was discussed before. maybe it was in irc. anyhow, the explaination as to my understanding is that "there isn't enough room for memory addresses" for you to be able to choose your exact model. I do agree though, being able to choose your exact model out of all available ones would be really awesome in deathmatch and it would add a tremendous amount of personality to it, people would recognize you by model instead of name. The way it is set up right now is very well suited to teamplay however. Link to comment
{ULK}Dome Posted May 30, 2004 Author Share Posted May 30, 2004 Yea man i could be like a swat guy, police officer, or army guy Or on the other hand i could be kenji, donald love, or that corrupted cop Link to comment
Guardians Proper Posted May 30, 2004 Share Posted May 30, 2004 Aren't they adding more selections in for 0.4? Seems like they put a lot of effort in GTA3 for 0.4 now. Link to comment
b0b0 Posted June 1, 2004 Share Posted June 1, 2004 "there isn't enough room for memory addresses" This has gotten rediculous. Why is the MTA Team making so many excuses and saying that some of these suggestions which seem possible are not? MAC Address banning, better anti-cheat, is it really so much to ask? And if it is, shouldn't the MTA Team be prepared to deal with these suggestions in a positive way? Multi Theft Auto has gotten very popular way too fast, and I don't know if the MTA Team is prepared to deal with this. The concept of Multiplayer GTA was laughable prior to the release of the very first MTA version, and yet we now have a working mod. So why is the MTA Team telling us that so many things are impossible? Aren't they the ones that did the impossible? Why can't they do it again? I am very disappointed at how pessimistic some of the team members are being. Either way, keep it together MTA Team and hang in there. Link to comment
Slothman Posted June 1, 2004 Share Posted June 1, 2004 no one said anything was impossible, just not figured out yet. Link to comment
+FKU+VVolven Posted June 1, 2004 Share Posted June 1, 2004 "there isn't enough room for memory addresses"This has gotten rediculous. Why is the MTA Team making so many excuses and saying that some of these suggestions which seem possible are not? etc. etc. etc... I've been browsing these forums for a few months, and the only time I've seen a MTA dev say the word impossible, it has always been followed with "with the current core/client/server". Just cuz it's not possible to do now or even in the near future doesn't mean it never will be. Link to comment
Si|ent Posted June 1, 2004 Share Posted June 1, 2004 there isn't enough room for memory addresses" This has gotten rediculous. Why is the MTA Team making so many excuses and saying that some of these suggestions which seem possible are not? Excuse me? We have never said that, or anything like it that would hold the same meaning. The character select options have nothing to do with 'room for memory adresses'. Note that slothman is NOT a team member and bear this in mind when reading his posts. Link to comment
Guardians Proper Posted June 1, 2004 Share Posted June 1, 2004 Just because that's what the people on the forum say, doesn't mean that's what the MTA Devs say. Link to comment
Slothman Posted June 1, 2004 Share Posted June 1, 2004 as i stated in my post, thats something i heard one time. i didn't mean to give anyone the impression that it was an authoratative comment. Link to comment
Recommended Posts