Jump to content

2003 official R* reaction


Blokker_1999

Recommended Posts

Posted

Nar i somehow doubt that, Rockstar would have their own team of Network Programmers to intergrate a Multiplayer Feature Directly into the coding, instead of injecting data into the GTA Engine Externally.

but in my opinion they know that there is no rush to create a Multiplayer for it, because that will know MTA Exist and are doing good work for the GTA World

  • 2 years later...
Posted

*Sigh*...where did these good, old gamers, modders, and supporters go...

Side note: I know I'm bumping this topic. That's the whole point behind my response.

  • 2 years later...
Posted
Did R* ever contact MTA team after this?

I've heard rumors that they provided some information about GTA:SA before they stopped helping modders, and they got some praise about MTA:SA in it's very early stages, but I haven't heard much since.

Posted
How did they react to MTA? :)

Are you actually not capable of seeing the first post or just post whoring?

Actually to be more specific I wanted to know how they reacted to MTA:SA.

You shouldn't approach a post with that sort of attitude. Trust me, I don't keep track of post count.

Posted

Rockstar did respond to one of MTA's earlier variants in 2003. But, likely due to the fiasco regarding Hot Coffee mid-2005, Rockstar probably just shuts itself away from all mods nowadays and doesn't give any recognition or praise to anybody. At least they've remained neutral, I suppose.

Posted
Rockstar did respond to one of MTA's earlier variants in 2003. But, likely due to the fiasco regarding Hot Coffee mid-2005, Rockstar probably just shuts itself away from all mods nowadays and doesn't give any recognition or praise to anybody. At least they've remained neutral, I suppose.

For a short while they actually took a no-support stance on modders after Hot Coffee. There was a lot of resentment thanks to the media making such a huge deal out of it. Thankfully they are generally neutral again, hence why IV:MP is now considered legal by them. Previously they disallowed it because of the no-support stance.

  • 1 year later...
  • 11 months later...
  • 1 year later...
  • 8 years later...
Posted

20 years now, wow. Shame R* ended up the way they are now and chose not to endorse MTA when times were simpler - what could've been...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...