Guest Posted May 24, 2004 Share Posted May 24, 2004 I was just wandering about banning cheaters. I lot of people use DHCP-IP-addresses and banning by IP-address is not allways functional. This is just a suggestion and I think that this is an issua to be discussed. I think that using similar wonID as f.ex. Half-Life uses would greatly decrese cheaters re-emerging with new IP-addresses. No I don't mean pay-per-ID-system. But a free IDcode that one would get by registering with functional e-mail address to a dedicated MTA-registering service. Ok, i realize that a cheater would get a new ID by registerin with a different e-mail address, but it would be quite a work to register allways again and get some free e-mail address to get a new IDcode.. This would not be too much of a work for those who really use MTA without cheating.. What would you think? Link to comment
eAi Posted May 24, 2004 Share Posted May 24, 2004 This has been suggested many times: http://forum.mtavc.com/viewtopic.php?t= ... ight=wonid http://forum.mtavc.com/viewtopic.php?t= ... ight=wonid Its obviously not practical as R* didn't give out unique serial numbers, so we have no way to differentiate reliably between user A and user B. In the future, we may be able to implement a system for this, but it'd have to be pretty complex to be of any use, and to authenticate users would require a dedictated server = money (which we don't have). eAi Link to comment
Ransom Posted May 24, 2004 Share Posted May 24, 2004 Ok, i realize that a cheater would get a new ID by registerin with a different e-mail address, but it would be quite a work to register allways again and get some free e-mail address to get a new IDcode.. A time interval could also be put in, but of course a dedicated cheater will go to another computer but this would slow them down. Link to comment
orappa Posted May 24, 2004 Share Posted May 24, 2004 What I like best about MTA is its pick-up-and-play gameplay. Loads of people are going to be put off if they have to give out personal details when it's not entirely necessary. Link to comment
<VMP>Sobeit Posted May 24, 2004 Share Posted May 24, 2004 i just started learning C++ and i mean JUST started, and i found how to randomize a number, couldnt u implement that into a serial-code type ban, so at least they would have to download the program again to stop thier punkizm (and i would know that it is the trouble one has to go through to cheat which makes them stop, like UT2004 for instance, its not that i CANT cheat, its just too much goddamned trouble, encrypted packets, and punkbuster is just too damn much 4 me ) Link to comment
Recommended Posts